Wednesday, February 22, 2012 ..:: It's Your Money News - Canada ::..   Login
 It's Your Money News Minimize

Banks Are Doing Well – How About You?

 

In spite of the fact that even little old Scotiabank just reported $1 billion in profits for the last quarter, sometime in the next few years you know we’ll be talking about bank mergers again. The argument by the banks is that they have to be much larger to compete globally. But the other side of that is the pretty sure bet that reduced competition will impact consumers in higher fees and rates, as well as less access, and the loss of thousands of jobs.

 

Not so many years ago, the banks told us they’d be in real trouble without mergers. Well, not quite, because they’re doing very well. In fact, Fortune magazine just released their Global 500 rating of companies. Yes, the largest firms ON THE GLOBE – so this is the list of the who’s who in the world.

 

And right in the middle, at number 250, is the Royal Bank, with net income of $4.7 billion – up 40% from last year. In fact, the big 6 banks made $19 billion last year between them – up almost 60% from a year earlier! Yes, 60% - did your income go up that much last year, or are you just paying way too much in interest and service charges to make the big 6 banks rich?

 

On the Global 500, the Royal Bank is just behind such giants as Suzuki Motors and Bridgestone. But they’re larger than Coca Cola and the drug giant Merck.

 

So the next time you’re looking for a loan or line of credit, don’t feel bad about negotiating a better interest rate. The banks are doing fine – it’s us consumers that need a break on interest rates and fees.

 

Or better yet, make one of your quotes from a credit union which isn’t just locally owned and controlled but is also non-profit and will rebate you a chunk of your interest costs at the end of the year in profit-sharing. I just got over $400 back for 2006!

 

And maybe one day the banks can actually take an interest in us - instead of just charging us interest.

 

 

 

Up Up and Away – Our Debts – Not Our Savings

 

The Vanier Institute released a study a couple of weeks ago called The State of Canadian Family Finances as well as a report form CIBC World Markets stating that we’ve still got our foot solidly on the gas pedal when it comes to taking on debt. So the average family is going backwards financially, and not ahead.

 

25 years ago, our total debt was 86% of our household incomes – today it’s 122%. So we’re increasing our debts, which come along with higher and more payments, which obviously take away a bigger chunk of our income. In fact, the studies point out that the end of 2006 saw our debts increase twice as fast as our incomes.

 

But to pay these payments we need more money than we’re earning. Never mind the fact that we’re also stretching the terms of what we’re borrowing. That’s why our savings rate is now minus 1 percent. We’re actually cashing in savings and going further in the hole. We’re robbing tomorrow to pay for yesterday because 60% of households are out of money before the end of the month arrives.

 

Oh sure, the top 20% still save – they save $16,000 a year on average, but the rest of us don’t and almost 50% of us have no savings on hand at all.

 

So does your emergency fund have a credit card logo on it? Does $1,000 or so of room on your credit card seem to be your emergency fund?

 

What does our increased debt load also cause? Well, the rate of home ownership is actually dropping in Canada. In fact, for people under age 44, it’s dropped almost 10%. More debt for things we thought were important yesterday, more payments at higher and higher rates, no savings to speak of and much less chance to purchase a home.

 

It’s a vicious cycle, yet economists keep telling us it’s not a problem. And what’s even more scary is that so many people believe that – or is that just what we want to hear instead of facing our financial reality and making some difficult spending choices?

 

 

 

Mr. Layton: Say It Ain't So!

 

Please tell me you’re not buzzing about the cheap Jack Layton stunt about ATM fees, or my head will explode! Can you say "bull?"

 

OK let me back up. Jack Layton, the leader of the NDP declared that the $400 or so million we spend in ATM fees should be outlawed. Now, whenever Mr. Layton makes an announcement, this one in front of an ATM machine for maximum picture affect, the media listens and covers the story. But it’s like yelling “fire” when there isn’t one. 

 

There are many many things in the banking industry thta really should be regulated, reported and addressed. Just overdrafts and credit card issues come to mind as no-brainers. But ATM fees aren't it! And I can't believe I'm defending the banking industry. That's the LAST thing I want to be doing!

 

But ATM fees are not usery, a rip off or gouging. Mr. Layton is simply committing a cheap publicity stunt and Democracy Watch is now jumping on the bandwagon, appearing to send out press releases, also without thinking things through, first. And that’s sad.

When someone has their money in the Royal Bank and they tap the TD machine - they're NOT getting hosed! They're getting A LOAN!!! Their money isn’t in the TD, whose machine they're using, so there's a fee. The TD, in this example, is lending the person the withdrawal and collects it back from the Royal Bank.

 

Move two blocks down the street and go to YOUR bank where YOUR money actually is and there’s no fee of any kind. Never has been – never will be. Convenience, for everything in our life, comes at a price. A price we choose to pay, more often than not. We choose to pay the $2 convenience fee (named quite correctly) to avoid the two block drive. Simple as that.

 

What would be the next thing? Legislation to outlaw Canada Post charging for stamps? After all, in Mr. Layton's logic it's an essential service that millions of Canadians rely on to get their cheques and to pay their bills.

 

If I had my way, banks would shut down their ATM machines for one day so anyone from another financial institution would be declined. But there'd be a big note on the screen: "Please go to your own bank to avoid the service charge. Or contact Jack Layton's office to point out how really stupid this is."

 

To me, this is a really sad situation. Why is there a total disconnect between leadership and politicians? Or is that just an oxymoron? Mr. Layton is one of the top five most influential politicians in the country in this minority government. How sad that his party has chosen publicity stunts over doing good, raising awareness and making a difference.

 

I spend a ton of energy, time, talent and money on making an effort to educate people and to make a difference in their financial lives. I dream of ever having the kind of stage the NDP can easily create at the drop of a dime. How sad that a great opportunity, and tons of media coverage over a number of days, is used up on something that simply isn’t true – but just good politics. What a wasted opportunity to really make a difference, Mr. Layton. Shame on you for dealing in politics and not in helping people!

 

Politics and getting into the media was chosen over substance, or the NDP focus would have been on:

 

*overdraft fees which trigger without notice because banks do not disclose the current transaction will get the client into overdraft fees and charges

 

*Payday lenders and their rates, fees and rollovers

 

*US style fees on credit cards, which are exploding, along with shrinking grace periods and five percent interest rate increases, immediately on any arrears - but often no clear guidelines how to get the rate back down

 

*Over-limit fees that were recently introduced for credit cards, which have just now been extended to lines of credit and trigger automatically without any ability by clients to opt out by simply having the credit charge rejected. (Lenders will honour the $10 credit card charge that takes clients over their limit because they can immediately charge the $20 or so over-limit fee

 

*The use of credit scores on every type of loan application which directly affects the interest rates applied to the loans, yet there is no disclosure of them, nor do 95% of Canadians even know this score exists, or can access it as part of their free credit bureau report

 

*Proper disclosure of fees charged with advertised "no interest" plans by thousands of retailers that aren't no interest at all when fees ranging from $0 to $200 are included

 

 

 


Syndicate   Print   

   Minimize

 Print   

   Minimize



Send

 

 Print   

Copyright © Vantage Consulting   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement